The Dark Side of AI Marketing: Actors Regret Selling Their Image Rights
News242 weeks ago
850

The Dark Side of AI Marketing: Actors Regret Selling Their Image Rights

Digital Marketing
aimarketing
imagerights
digitaladvertising
actors
legalissues
Share this content:

Summary:

  • Actors selling image rights face challenges with misuse in objectionable ads.

  • Contracts limit their ability to remove unwanted content, leading to exploitation.

  • AI technology enables cheaper and realistic advertising, creating digital models for brands.

  • The process involves a quick shoot and allows for diverse emotional portrayals.

  • Many actors encounter abusive clauses in contracts that grant unrestricted rights to their likeness.

Actors Regret Selling Their Image Rights to AI Marketing Companies

South Korean actor Simon Lee was shocked to see his likeness being used in questionable ads on TikTok and Instagram, often portraying him as a gynaecologist or surgeon promoting dubious health cures. He, along with many others, licensed their image to AI marketing companies, only to find themselves in deepfakes, misleading advertisements, or even political propaganda.

Legal Limitations
Many actors find that contracts limit their ability to remove such content, leaving them vulnerable to misuse. Simon expressed his frustration, stating, "If it was a nice advertisement, it would've been fine, but obviously it is such a scam." He is now represented by a digital clone promoting products like lemon balm tea for weight loss.

The Appeal of AI Technology

AI technology is cheaper than traditional filming yet more realistic than fully AI-generated avatars. It allows brands to create catalogues of digital models for advertising at a fraction of the cost. Solene Vasseur, a digital communications and AI consultant, highlighted that this form of advertising is both fast and cost-effective.

The Process of Creating Avatars

The method involves a half-day shoot with a green screen and teleprompter. Actors convey various emotions, enabling AI to generate an avatar that can speak in multiple languages. Alexandru Voica, head of corporate affairs at Synthesia, noted that real human expressiveness still surpasses what AI can currently produce.

Financial Incentives and Ethical Dilemmas

Actors like Adam Coy signed contracts for quick financial gain—selling his image rights for $1,000. However, he later found his avatar making bizarre claims about future disasters, which his contract did not prohibit, except for specific content types like pornographic material.

Connor Yeates, another actor, faced similar issues when he discovered his likeness was used in politically charged content. Despite the financial difficulties that led him to this decision, he expressed regret upon realizing the implications of his contract.

Legal Concerns

Legal experts caution that many contracts contain abusive clauses that grant companies unrestricted rights to a creator's voice and image. Alyssa Malchiodi, a business law attorney, warns that technology is evolving faster than legal frameworks can keep up, calling for greater caution in these agreements.

As AI continues to reshape marketing, the experiences of these actors serve as a cautionary tale about the potential pitfalls of selling image rights in the digital age.

Comments

0

Join Our Community

Sign up to share your thoughts, engage with others, and become part of our growing community.

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts and start the conversation!

Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to receive our daily digested news

Join our newsletter and get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox.

OR
MarketingRemoteJobs.app logo

MarketingRemoteJobs.app

Get MarketingRemoteJobs.app on your phone!